LOL … reminds me of being on a cruise ship that had auto billing blocks of data 
– thought I had closed up my Mac and taken it offline … next morning the usage 
window pops up and almost 4GB later … tough less to learn when the AMEX bill 
came in ;0 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
Sent: July 19, 2016 1:38 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Satelite connectivity while traveling.

 

If you hook a BGAN up to an ordinary laptop running Win7/Win10/OSX, be 
extremely cautious with what it's set up to do on the network automatically - 
you would not believe the ridiculous BGAN bills I have seen people incur from 
windows updates, automatic itunes updates, leaving Outlook open but not doing 
anything and having Outlook decide to resynchronize 1GB of email with a remote 
Exchange server, etc. 

Leave a laptop connected to a BGAN overnight and transfer 2000MB at $5/MB...

 

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Brandon Yuchasz <li...@gogebicrange.net 
<mailto:li...@gogebicrange.net> > wrote:

Eric and others thanks for the help. Looks like BGAN is what I will want to be 
looking into if I want to do it right. I could cover the majority of my needs 
for about 500$ for 100 meg  in data over a 90 day period. That would more than 
likely cover my needs during the fall which is when I take all my trips “way up 
north”. 

 

The whole thing started with me looking into GPS messenger / texting services 
so I could stay in touch. Then I started getting greedy. 

 

I think I will do a little test over the next week and see how much data I use 
tethering to my phone that will give me a good idea how much I would need in a 
really remote area to log in a fix a few things.

 

Brandon Yuchasz

GogebicRange.net

www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf 
Of Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 8:33 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Satelite connectivity while traveling.

 

Iridium Go still uses the existing Iridium network, it's still 2400 baud with 
v42bis (until the next generation of Iridium LEO satellites launch), it's just 
a small portable modem with bluetooth/wifi link to your devices. I assure you 
it'll be completely frustrating and impossible to use for interactive TCP/IP 
services at 2400 baud and 1350ms latency with 5% packet loss. It's for email 
and SMS only.

The current Iridium network is not really 9600 baud, it's quoted as 9600 
because that's a theoretical speed you can achieve if transferring a v42bis 
compressed text file at 2400 bps. Basically the same as BBS dialup with a good 
quality US Robotics modem at 2400 baud if you download a pure ASCII text file. 

It's actually kind of a miracle of voice codecs and compression technology that 
they managed to squeeze voice calls into 2400 baud with R&D from 1994-1998. If 
you ever have the pleasure of speaking with someone on a handheld Iridium phone 
it's very robotic.

There is also an Iridium product for maritime use that multiplexes three or 
four Iridium modems into a single terminal, for somewhat better speeds. It's 
marketed at large ships and for yacht owners who are so rich that they don't 
care about the $/MB transferred or that it costs $13,000 in diesel to fill 
their yacht.

Interestingly Iridium coverage gets BETTER as you go further north (or very far 
south, like the Antarctic peninsula and plateau) because the satellites are in 
90 degree inclined polar orbits, their orbits all converge over the poles 
(example: historical satellite collision with dead russian satellite!). There's 
also fewer active users and SBD terminals as you go further north.

 

 

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org 
<mailto:p...@paulstewart.org> > wrote:

I had option B for many years simply for making voice calls in remote areas.  
Worked very well …

 

Eric did a great summary of options (way better than I ever could) … wondering 
if Iridium Go! Is an option that might work … don’t know much more than what I 
read on the website though … and I didn’t see anywhere about speeds but 
$159/month isn’t bad for something like this… (150 minutes voice, unlimited 
data and SMS).  Hardware options include vehicle kit and other stuff ….

 

Eric – do you know much about that particular service and it’s totally got me 
curious too as I ATV sometimes into very remote areas where there’s no cell 
coverage and my emergency plan is SPOT satellite messenger device (just 
upgraded to Gen3) which works great, but just being able to make a phone call 
is appealing too …. Just noticed actually on the findmespot.com 
<http://findmespot.com>  website that they now have a phone service too with a 
data option – 9600 baud but better than nothing ;)

 

How far “north” is the real question – I had my Iridium phone a couple hundred 
miles south of Alert one time and it didn’t work at all which wasn’t surprising 
but it did work in Resolute which did surprise me… 

 

Paul

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf 
Of Brandon Yuchasz
Sent: July 18, 2016 8:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Satelite connectivity while traveling.

 

Option B is certainly something I would consider. Phone is good but without 
data I am still pretty blind.

 

Option C sound promising. 5$ a MB is fine if I spend 100$ + to deal with an 
issue that needs to be dealt with fine. 

 

I should point out a vehicle installed / mounted option would probably be a 
good way to go. Its my truck that goes on these trips.

 

Best regards,

Brandon Yuchasz

GogebicRange.net

www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:45 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Satelite connectivity while traveling.

 

I've worked in satellite for many years...  You have a few options and none are 
cheap for high latitudes:

a) Portable VSAT terminal 0.9 to 1.2 meter size range, Ku or Ka-band. Expensive 
hardware and service starts from $450/mo in a highly contended TDMA network. 
You'd need to verify spot beam coverage and signal strength in particular 
locations if you're going to the north. Most consumer grade VSAT stuff is not 
appropriate. There are Ka-band services on Telesat satellites which are resold 
by XPlornet and others in Canada for high latitude fixed-site Ka-band VSAT 
services. Not very portable stuff - it's designed to be installed and aimed 
once on the side of a house.

b) Iridium handheld phone - works literally anywhere on the planet but you're 
NOT going to web browse on it. It's 2400 baud with v42bis compression. Works 
for SMS, voice and email. 

c) Inmarsat BGAN terminal - how do you feel about $5/MB?  Also, uses 
geostationary satellites so if you're going to high latitudes connectivity 
might be a problem. Can't use the very small laptop sized BGAN terminals in 
northern Canada.

For a "shit hits the fan" solution there's nothing more portable and better 
than an Iridium phone and a portable 20W solar charger. The $40/mo service 
accounts come with no minutes, you set up your credit card for usage billing. 
If SHTF then you don't care that it's $1.19/minute to make a call.

 

 

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Brandon Yuchasz <li...@gogebicrange.net 
<mailto:li...@gogebicrange.net> > wrote:

I am wondering if anyone has had any experience with and products that would 
provide me a data connection through satellite? Not a dish system something 
more portable.

The scenario is I have a few trips coming up. The first later this year is the 
same I take every year far north Canada and no cell signal where we stay. I can 
get texts sometimes and have to go to town to find wifi 45 minutes one way one 
truck for the group so going to town affects everyone. I don’t every plan to 
work on this trip but if SHTF then I might need to get online diagnose and 
instruct what to replace. So this leads me to the idea of satellite remote 
access. I would need to connect via VPN to the network speed is not terribly 
important. 

 

Anyone got any experience? Upfront cost is a little of a concern. Minutes / 
data cost is not if its expensive fine.

 

 

Best regards,

Brandon Yuchasz

GogebicRange.net

www.gogebicrange.net <http://www.gogebicrange.net/> 

 

 

 

 

Reply via email to