lol, powercode and automatic, no but yes on CPE radios being in the same range, including the repeater ap and the repeater cpe. i could do subnets for those but powercode is...not clean.. in doing so, so its easier to just keep it in the same /24
there are monitoring options, I just use icmp for everything because powercodes historic failures on everything else (it may have changed since a few years ago) I should have put the LAN LAN bridge as more of a neat thing to have Im primarly concernerd anout the port1-5 "WAN and 2-4,wlan "LAN" functioning correctly solely being configured as a bridge On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > I shouldn't email after midnight. > > So basically powercode is automatically monitoring that /24 so you want > the CPE radio, and the point to point radios to all be in that same range. > Is that the deal? > > If you want that and also want a layer2 tunnel between the LAN ports on > the two routers, then I do believe you'll have to manually add that tunnel > each time rather than having a generic config. > > Does powercode only ping monitored devices or does it automatically > discover services on certain ports? Maybe the router can be at the > midpoint like I was saying, but you always put the repeater AP on port > 8001, and the repeater station is always on port 8002, etc.....could > powercode be configured to automatically discover and monitor services on > those ports and thus monitor the up/down state of the repeater bridge > thingy-ma-bobbers? > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: 7/20/2016 12:22:14 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mikrotik repeater point router config > > > because the layer 2 is on a /24 off the site router that the AP resides > bruh > powercode requires any monored IP to be present in the BMU config > I can add subnets to customer accounts, but thats the only place theyre > listed (powercode is lacking lately) > so it would go back to maintaining a spreadsheet to keep track of small > subnets outside the primary ones since powercode offers no tool to keep > them centrally managed > > > off each site we keep a 10.2.x.x/24 for cpe radios, each AP gets 60ish of > them (10.2.x.2-10.2-60, 10.2.x.61-120, 10.2.x.12-180... then 10.2.1x.x when > we need more for APs x=numeric site ID) > the NAT routers are 10.0.x.2-240 x=numeric site ID > and the publics are a subnetted distribution of our /22 ARIN allocation > DHCP is a requirement because I have to resize the public allocations > based on site demand > Static public are a whole other mess that we only give free to business > rates, residential have to pay 10/month for statics > > If powercode actually handled documenting the subnets correctly, it would > probably be awesomer, but it is what it is, crummy since simon left after > killing the guy before him > > > 1. Our AP to the house is all layer 2 (AP-CPE-Repeater AP-Repeater > CPE-remote router) > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> Oh wait, you wanted monitoing and mangement access. Make an exception in >> the NAT rule. >> /ip firewall nat add chain=srcnat src-address=192.168.1.0/24 >> dst-address-list !=monitoring action=masquerade >> /ip firewall address-list add list=monitoring address=<powercode> >> /ip firewall address-list add list=monitoring address=<your office> >> /ip firewall address-list add list=monitoring address=<your house> >> /ip firewall address-list add list=monitoring address=<my house> >> /ip firewall address-list add list=monitoring address=<your mom's house> >> >> >> ------ Original Message ------ >> From: "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: 7/19/2016 11:50:36 PM >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mikrotik repeater point router config >> >> >> IDK bruh >> Why not make the barn mikrotik an ordinary NAT router and make the one at >> the house just an AP/Bridge? No fancy stuff required. >> >> >> A. What problems am I creating? >> B. if a customer wants to add their own device at the midpoint and get a >> public IP from our public pool, is there a way to leave a universal config >> but allow them to attach that (had considered leaving port 2 in the WAN so >> their device could pull DHCP, but then they would plug a computer in) >> C. assuming both routers are mikrotiks, and theyre both DHCP what would >> it take to bridge the two LANS (like EOIP) without VLANS since the repeater >> radios are vendor agnostic and might not pass it? >> D. how do I get the "WAN" bridge to bridge the CPE and the repeater AP >> but only pass the MAC of the bridge and not also the physical port? >> >> >> This is a value add (revenue) and will be a 5-10 dollar charge on top of >> a repeater fee so if the absolute only option is some client specific >> configuration I wouldnt be completely opposed, but would prefer at the end >> of the day to have a default config that will just work once we get the >> MACs for DHCP. >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
