I've had good success with www.logobench.com. $160 for multiple concepts
and they'll revise them
to your liking.

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

> Don’t hire the guys who designed this one (and don’t vote for the person
> who approved it):
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucent#Logo
>
> And if you’re going to use the letter T, make sure it isn’t doing
> something strange with another letter:
>
> http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/15/twitter-reacts-to-terrible-new-trump-pence-campaign-logo.html
>
>
> *From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, July 22, 2016 5:34 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] logo design
>
> I know what I want, just need somebody to draw it, digitize it, and advise
> me on the realities of resizing it. Its not even all that original
> a T that the top part is an umbrella, and matrixish rain
> "0111000101110101011000010110110001101001011101000111100100100000011100110110010101110010011101100110100101100011011001010010000001110011011101010111000001110000011011110111001001110100"
> with that (quality service support)
>
> Id guess theres like 500 guys with that logo, which makes me wonder if for
> the 350 quote theyre verifying its not a copyright violation
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
> wrote:
>
>> 99designs.com is very worth it. I don't know what you're looking at /
>> using now, but having a design contest with a guaranteed cash prize
>> will get some good designers lined up.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:21 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
>> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > is 350 bucks enough money for a logo? theyre kind of important. that
>> seems
>> > like a low price for something critical.
>> >
>> > --
>> > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>> team as
>> > part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to