Not for small villages with almost no budget.

On 7/26/2016 6:29 PM, Daniel White wrote:

I’d guess Cambium would say that the 450i platform is a better fit for government projects.

Daniel White

Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales

ConVergence Technologies__

Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *George Skorup
*Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2016 5:21 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I...

If only Cambium would let us unlock 4.9 on ePMP for the gov't projects we're doing.... hint hint, poke poke.

On 7/26/2016 3:12 PM, Daniel White wrote:

    If it is under a government FRN… then there is no license fees.

    You can’t have the link licensed under your FRN.

    Daniel White

    Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales

    ConVergence Technologies

    Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590

    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
    *Sent:* Tuesday, July 26, 2016 8:57 AM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I...

    >public safety agency owns the equipment they can license and only
    pay coordination costs (no FCC fees)

    So when you edit/add the site information on the FCC sites you
    don't have to pay if it's for government use?


    Josh Luthman
    Office: 937-552-2340
    Direct: 937-552-2343
    1100 Wayne St
    Suite 1337
    Troy, OH 45373

    On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Daniel White <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Adam,

        To answer your question, you cannot use 4.9GHz to provide
internet service, regardless of whom the end user is. Commercial traffic cannot pass over public safety systems
        (although a 4.9GHz user can distribute the Internet on their
        internal network using 4.9GHz).

        I’d guess if the tower site was the Demarc, the safety agency
        had a contract to lease space on the tower, and you donated
        the equipment to the safety agency it would all be kosher.

        I’m not a fan of 4.9GHz for most applications personally –
        remember safety agencies with higher priority in a disaster
        can shut down other networks to prevent interference (for
        instance, if FEMA moves into an area they can tell the city to
        shut down).

        Personally I’d use a Part 101 band and be done with it.  Once
        again though, if the public safety agency owns the equipment
        they can license and only pay coordination costs (no FCC
        fees).  So I would lease the equipment to the customer as part
        of the broadband services contract.

        Daniel White

        Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales

        ConVergence Technologies

        Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <tel:%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590>

        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

        *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *SmarterBroadband
        *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 3:53 PM
        *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I...

        Good to know, I will take a look.

        Is a county office OK to use 4.9?

        Adam

        *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Fink
        *Sent:* Monday, July 25, 2016 2:23 PM
        *To:* Jaime Solorza; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 4.9 Ghz PTP - Can I...

        B5c in 4.9 GHz is Part 90 Subpart Y certified, should get you
        200 Mbps+ aggregate in it’s max allowable channel
        configuration in that band. Great distance for it.

        Jaime Fink • Mimosa <http://www.mimosa.co> • CPO & Co-Founder

        On July 25, 2016 at 2:18:33 PM, Jaime Solorza
        ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>)
        wrote:

            Our county folks have Cisco 4.9Ghz radios but are
            replacing with 3.65 GHz due to hundreds of Radwins used
            across border by state and federal agencies.   I know
            Airaya had some 4.9GHz ptp solutions.... I know in 5GHz
            once they go up they stay up pretty solidly.

            On Jul 25, 2016 2:57 PM, "SmarterBroadband"
            <[email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            We currently provide 100 meg to our local county offices
            on an AF24.

            They want us to move the link to another location will be
            a 4.3 mile link, so AF24 is out.

            I need a link to do 100 meg now and be able to do 200 when
            requested, I want five nines, so Licensed.

            Can I use 4.9 Ghz for this?

            What is available for PTP in 4.9Ghz?

            If not, I could use a B11, but I hate to waste 11 Ghz
            spectrum on a short link.

            Suggestions in Licensed  18Ghz?

            BTW they are price sensitive.

            Thanks

            Adam

        
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>

                

        Virus-free. www.avast.com
        
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>


    
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>

        

    Virus-free. www.avast.com
    
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>



<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>


Reply via email to