I should mention that the comparison was for a) paying a utility pole contractor to deliver and install a treated pole, hole boring etc, 55' of pole above ground level, set directly into the earth
vs b) excavation, shoring, re-bar, concrete foundation work etc for a 55' steel pole On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > Never ordered one, but have priced them, for 50' to 55' a > thicker-than-normal wood utility pole is considerably less costly. Could be > different in a location that doesn't have a very large and widespread > timber industry (BC, WA). > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Jason McKemie < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Has anyone ordered a 40 - 50' lightweight Rohn Monopole (or other makes >> for that matter)? What was the pricing like? >> > >
