Looks like IEEE 1588v2 is more complicated than that, more like NTP. Or
telco Stratum clocks.
It may assume each client has a free running clock and just needs periodic
timing adjustments to keep it in sync with the master.
I guess an example of what NOT to do is that thing Ubiquiti tried.
-----Original Message-----
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 2:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Fw: Props to Netonix
Well, that assumes every baud would be a timing pulse. I think you could do
that on the physical layer OK. Just make one end GPS referenced and use
some kind of sync extractor. Count up 125,000,000 bauds and you have one
second.
-----Original Message-----
From: ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 1:27 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Props to Netonix
With GigE, you are sending 125 Mbaud.
So that would be an 8 nanosecond timing granularity.
Should be good enough. Forrest would know for certain.
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Moffett
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 1:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com ; af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Props to Netonix
Maybe, but in more general terms it propagates a clocking signal across
ethernet.
I don't think there's any reason it couldn't be used to propagate a 1pps
GPS clock.
Like any good standard, there's more than one to choose from. You have
an ITU and IEEE variant that do the same thing only different.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 8/19/2016 2:51:24 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Props to Netonix
Isn't SyncE for supporting Telco/TDM circuits over ethernet/microwave
networks?
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
That would seem to be a non trivial addition, and vendor specific.
What is the status of radio manufacturers adding SyncE support? I
really
don’t know anything about SyncE, but that seems like the way we should
be
heading. Does SyncE apply to optical interfaces also?
From: Eric Muehleisen
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 1:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Props to Netonix
Cherry on the top would be the ability to provide sync over power.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Erich Kaiser
<er...@northcentraltower.com>
wrote:
In all my years of doing this this is the most impressed I am with an
item
out of the box, I am very impressed with the Netonix switches, very
simple
to use, great features, and best of all it works as advertised! Having
the
variable voltage input on DC version is absolutely awesome! Keep up
the
good work!
Even the DIN mount is impressive and well thought out!
Erich Kaiser
North Central Tower
er...@northcentraltower.com
Office: 630-621-4804
Cell: 630-777-9291