It was the only solution we found that did not require an additional piece of equipment which I interpreted as fewer failure points. One router with NAT64/DNS64 built in.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 9:24 AM Wireless Administrator <wirel...@htn.net> wrote: > Lewis, > > That’s what I was gravitating to. Good to see you met with success. Did > you try anything else? > > > > Steve > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman > *Sent:* Friday, September 09, 2016 7:45 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] NAT64/DNS64 - Implementation Thoughts > > > > Juniper > > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016, 10:04 PM Wireless Administrator <wirel...@htn.net> > wrote: > > Has anyone implemented NAT64/DNS64? If so is there a recommended platform? > > > > It looks like Mikrotik is out on this one. > > > > Steve B. > > > > > >
