Interesting. I have an LTE install next week for a national car parts
dealer. I will share what I can when I finish job. I received a detail
SCOW but no vendor information. Gear arrives Monday. Kind of excited
because it's new to me.
On Sep 23, 2016 8:52 PM, "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We've had Telrad Compact 1000's for around 2.5 years, but they're running
> Wimax firmware because we were replacing older 16e installations. We have
> a number of sites now that have entirely dual mode CPE so we're about to
> pull the trigger on LTE. We're installing four LTE base stations next week
> on brand new sites, and assuming those go well we'll upgrade some existing
> Wimax sites.
>
> So yeah, within the next few weeks I'll know more. I'll definitely report
> back.
>
> It's interesting that you phrase it as "if it works at all." The issue
> with Wimax has never been it "working", it's just that it comes with a lot
> of quirks and it sucks at administration and troubleshooting. I'm speaking
> of Wimax in general here, not Telrad specifically....and I've used Wimax
> from three different vendors now. I have no fear about LTE working. I
> *am* afraid it will turn out to be cut from the same cloth as Wimax.
>
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: 9/23/2016 8:04:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz PMP450i :: Any real numbers?
>
>
> Aren't you doing Telrad? Please let us know if it works at all.
>
> On 9/23/2016 4:05 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> I'll let you know in a few weeks.
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: ch...@wbmfg.com
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: 9/23/2016 5:01:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz PMP450i :: Any real numbers?
>
>
> I wonder what LTE would do with the same RSSI.
>
> *From:* Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, September 23, 2016 2:46 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz PMP450i :: Any real numbers?
>
> Oh I also have somebody with a -88 who gets about half that.
> 900 was the last ditch effort for both of these.
> With wimax from the same tower we got a big fat nothing at both locations.
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: 9/23/2016 4:44:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz PMP450i :: Any real numbers?
>
>
> On the other end of the quality spectrum:
>
>
> *Link Test with Bridging*
> VC Downlink Uplink Aggregate Packet Transmit Packet Receive
> Actual Actual
> 19 6.07 Mbps 1.32 Mbps 7.39 Mbps, 474 pps 821 (410 pps) 128(64 pps)
> That's a -85 on a 5mhz channel. On any wider channel I lose this guy.
>
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
> From: "Dave" <dmilho...@wletc.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: 9/23/2016 4:17:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 900 MHz PMP450i :: Any real numbers?
>
>
> This is from one of ours
> Current Results StatusStats for LUID: 3 Test Duration: 5 Pkt Length:
> 1714 Test Direction Bi-Directional
>
> *RF Link Test*
> VC Downlink Uplink Aggregate Packet Transmit Packet Receive
> Actual Actual
> 19 26.13 Mbps 6.78 Mbps 32.92 Mbps, 2367 pps 2389 (477 pps) 9450(1890
> pps)
> *Efficiency*
> Downlink Uplink
> Efficiency Fragments
> count Efficiency Fragments
> count
> Actual Expected Actual Expected
> 100% 255254 255254 78% 84124 66231
> Link Test ran on 03:59:48 01/09/2011 UTC
>
> *Currently transmitting at:*
> VC 19 Rate 8X/8X MIMO-B
>
>
> On 09/23/2016 03:12 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>
> We're looking at doing a forklift on a couple of 900 MHz FSK APs. What are
> real world throughput numbers that any of you pioneers are getting? We
> would probably want to do 10 MHz channels at first, and I would hope that
> we could get > 15 Mbps in download, but maybe I'm being too conservative?
>
> The places we are looking at do not have Smart Meter issues.
>
> --
> bp
> part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com
>
>
> --
>
>
>
