Yep... if the interference wasn't in the same direction as the customer,
beam steering would help you, but I don't see that it'd do much in this
case.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:28 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> a blind AP is a blind AP no matter how you cut it, if the interference is
> coming in from the same direction as the sm, not alot you can do. with -50
> floor that sector is effectively not there. can you go lower with the
> sector and hope ground clutter will mitigate the campus interference to a
> point you can get a reasonable snr. compared to what you have right now hin
> dropping to a -70 if you can get clutter to -80 is better,
> but if thats the floor, youre better served to get a tight shielded
> directional antenna rather than a sector and do ptp
>
> beamsteering is focusing energy at the subscriber more than anything isnt
> it?
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If the interference is on the subscriber end, it should affect the
>> downstream traffic. Interference on the AP side (which you don't seem to be
>> having) would affect he upstream.
>>
>> Something else is going on.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 10/28/2016 1:02 PM, Nate Burke wrote:
>>
>>> So the EPMP2000 with beam steering on the upstream side. If you have a
>>> customer that is in line with the source of the Interference, they're still
>>> hosed right? The AP still wont' be able to hear them over the noise.
>>>
>>> I have a EPMP sector with a single customer on it and the AP is running
>>> about -50 noise across the entire band (5.1 and 5.7) I think the source of
>>> the interference is a close by corporate campus that's probably flooded
>>> with 5ghz wifi, and this customer is directly in between the tower and the
>>> campus. I can only get MCS level 1 on the upstream side with a receive
>>> level of -48. EPMP2000 would have no effect in this scenario, right?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>
