its doable under certain circumstances, what are your heights on both ends?
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 8:42 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: > Your speed/distance/budget is unrealistic > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <c...@infowest.com> > wrote: > >> Did SAF try 6GHz? Or did they only try 5GHz? >> Seems a 2+0 at 6 would probably work at that distance.. although seawater >> is a factor I dunno about >> >> >> On Oct 31, 2016, at 18:32, Charles Regan <charles.re...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Well here's SAF response: >> *My link planning team confirmed SAF does not have a viable 5GHz radio >> that can achieve your objective for this path.* >> >> Trango: >> *rough calculation suggests that even using space diversity will yield a >> 3 - 4 'nines' link (predicted reliability) at around 200Mbps FDX. The use >> of space diversity will also add considerably to the cost (a complete link >> might be upwards of $50K).* >> >> I'll ask SIAE... >> >> On Oct 31, 2016 9:19 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> 20k? >>> >>> SIAE AlfoPlus2 6 GHz 1024QAM dual polarity link. Or two pairs of >>> alfoplus1 1024qam (single polarity) radios running in parallel, opposite >>> polarities, equal OSPF cost between routers. >>> >>> Or Trango's 1024QAM 6GHz radios. >>> >>> Why not SAF? I thought there was a 6 GHz version of the Integra now. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Charles Regan <charles.re...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello everyone, >>>> >>>> What would you guys use for a 60 miles PTP link? 400Mbps. Oh and it's >>>> over seawater... 20k$ budget. >>>> >>>> SAF, Trango both said sorry, can't do. >>>> Mimosa B5C with space diversity and 3k$ maybe. >>>> >>>> We do have a working AF5x with a 34dbi dish doing 150Mbps aggregate. >>>> The link gets bad sometimes because of ducting/reflection. >>>> >>>> How could I use two parabolics dish on different polarity with the AF5x >>>> for space diversity? Splitter? >>>> >>>> Should a B5C perform better or worse ? >>>> >>>> Charles >>>> >>> >>> >
