"if"...
I agree with you Trump has been inflammatory. He was my last choice to
be the GOP nominee. I'd go so far as to say if any of the rest of the
field (including Jeb, who I also didn't care for) would've gotten the
nomination, Twitch would be behind by 30 points in the polls. If Romney
was running she'd be behind by 40 points.
Twitch also has had her fair share of racists remarks. And lies you can
hear straight from her own mouth. I annotated a video on my FB page and
provided many references to her racist remarks. If you care to look,
it's at
https://www.facebook.com/TransAmSam/posts/1197487210287190?pnref=story
I don't know why Trump didn't do a better job of countering her in the
debates - especially when she went on that rant about "making the
wealthy pay their fair share". What bullshit. The top 20% of income
earners already pay 84% of all individual federal income taxes. I'd say
they're paying their fair share, as well as huge share of the bottom 80%.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/top-20-of-earners-pay-84-of-income-tax-1428674384
On 11/3/2016 12:19 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
What if its actually not all some giant conspiracy by the man to hold us
down?
What if there are cases of political psyops, but their numbers are very
slim and these are actually the type of people that are attracted to
this candidate?
He's been very inflammatory with his remarks, and some suggest that many
of his statements have a racist and/or xenophobic slant.
Is it really out of the realm of possibility that these things are
simply as they appear?
On Nov 3, 2016 10:52 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm"
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
just like the black church they just burned in mississippi and
painted vote trump on, the left will send out a boatload of freshly
shaved heads in trump shirt to polling places
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Sam Morris <w...@csilogan.com
<mailto:w...@csilogan.com>> wrote:
huffingtonpost.com <http://huffingtonpost.com> is to the web
what NBC and Brian Williams, CBS and Stephen Colbert, HBO and
Bill Maher, and the NY Times are to credible "journalism". They
are designed for, and make targets of, the low-information
voters who don't know how to fact-check or research for
themselves and instead, believe what they want to believe, or
are told to believe.
On 11/2/2016 9:54 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
Huffington post...not exactly bastions of impartiality. But
torii know
those Nazi routes are biff on both security and monitoring
your @$&*
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016, 9:39 PM Jaime Solorza
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com <mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com
<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpost.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_581a5a45e4b01a82df64852a%2Famp#pt0-370971
<https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm.huffpost.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_581a5a45e4b01a82df64852a%2Famp#pt0-370971>
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
