Why not just nat/cgnat at that point? are we even going to see 100% ipv6 in our life time?
$10 a sub to buy a ipv4 isn't really that expensive anyway... On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <c...@infowest.com> wrote: > Wonder if I could offer an “IPv6-Only” type of account at a discounted > rate. > They'd get their Netflix, their Facebook and everything else that’s v6 > reachable. > If they can’t get to a v4 only site/service, then they can be the vocal > ones complaining to the site owners to get their act in gear. > > > On Nov 12, 2016, at 10:47 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> > wrote: > > Except that you literally cannot ‘move to IPv6’ and have happy clients yet. > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On > Behalf Of *Kurt Fankhauser > *Sent:* Saturday, November 12, 2016 7:17 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 auction alternatives? > > Wow, didn't know that /24's were going for that high. I would move to IPv6 > as fast as I can! > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > > That's actually a pretty good price. > > On Nov 11, 2016 6:42 PM, "Dev" <d...@logicalwebhost.com> wrote: > > Are there any other alternatives than the ipv4auctions.com style > websites, which seem like highway robbery at $3584 current bid for a /24? > > >
