I missed the start of the webinar... so this just requires, a license on the AP? what kind of cost are they talking about?
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:36 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > better than buying new licenses > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 'thats sweet' = that really sucks, right? I kinda hate that model. >> Lightning has no time for a RMA. >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:29 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> im hoping the sm software is full feature for short ptp, but i doubt it >>> is. >>> licensed is locked to the AP, but you can RMA a failed AP and move the >>> license to the RMA unit, thats sweet >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> They found out that their new ePMP CPEs use the same hardware as the >>>> oldest UBNT-Atheros-Crap. So no porting problem. Just install the same SW. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >>>> /sarcasm >>>> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 16:12 >>>> *An:* [email protected] >>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Nicely done, Cambium! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> you have to wonder if at some point cambium hired marsellus wallace >>>> and some hard, pipe-hittin' people, who'll go to work on the ubnt >>>> managers here with a pair of pliers and a blow torch to get hardware access >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 9:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> im in the webinar, I didnt realize thats what the webinar was when I >>>> signed up for it but now im all giddy like a school girl >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I prefer the Cambium direct link: http://www.cambiumnetwor >>>> ks.com/blog/dont-migrate---elevate/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Very interesting indeed... very interesting. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Tyler Treat < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> This ought to shake things up a bit. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>> >>>> / <http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161130005468/en/> >>>> >>>> www.businesswire.com >>>> >>>> / >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
