It's all about your margins. Moar signal, tighter APs, etc.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 11:30:14 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News? PMP. 5 GHz unlicensed. 4096QAM. 100 MHz channel. And world peace. Seriously, how much trouble do you have getting a 40 MHz airFiber PTP link to run at 10X? And where are you going to find 100 MHz of 5 GHz spectrum for PMP? The acronym LTU almost seems like a play on LTE-U, but that makes no sense, as LTE-U talks directly to handsets. -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Adam Moffett Sent: Friday, December 9, 2016 10:49 AM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News? New radio platform from the air fiber team. In a nutshell: FDD or HDD PTMP 4096QAM Custom silicon rather than COTS chipset 2 million PPS channel sizes up to 100mhz The speaker makes an allusion to copying the useful features from LTE but leaving the mobility baggage. It's powerpointware / vaporware at the moment. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Bill Prince" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: 12/9/2016 11:43:07 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450m , No News is Good News? >OK. I'm not familiar with the LTU thing, and I try to avoid marketing >hype from UBNT. LTE is Long Term Evolution, and is capable under ideal >circumstances of pushing ~~ 17 bits/Hz. > >What pray tell is LTU? > > >bp ><part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> > >On 12/9/2016 4:55 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: >>The confusion between LTE and LTU has to be intentional on UBNT's >>side. If not to ride on something else's coattails, why would you use >>a very similar acronym? >
