The idea looks to use already regularly scheduled commercial aircraft and
mesh the backhaul between aircraft in the air.

On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The question is how many subscribers does it take to keep one of their
> aircraft orbiting, and how large of an area does that cover. It's tough to
> make a business case for this unless both of those numbers are pretty large.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 12/26/2016 2:25 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>
> Of all the business plan models I�ve run, I don�t think budgeting in
> the cost of flying airplanes was going to make them profitable.� Do these
> guys really think this is a good idea?� When Viasat gets their next
> satellite running late next year, these guys are toast.� Maybe I�m
> missing something but do you see these guys having a chance?
>
> �
>
> *Rory Conaway **� Triad Wireless �** CEO*
>
> *4226 S. 37th Street � Phoenix � AZ 85040*
>
> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>*
>
> *r...@triadwireless.net <r...@triadwireless.net>*
>
> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>*
>
> *�*
>
> �One thing you learned as a Cubs fan, when you bought a ticket, you
> could always bank on seeing the bottom of the ninth.� � Joe Garagiola
>
> �
>
>
>


-- 
David Kunat

Reply via email to