Not bad On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:45 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is a 5MHz channel. Yes, significant noise at the AP. Should hopefully > get better once we shut down the FSK. Hopefully we can move to 7MHz. > > This customer's downlink power level is at -56dBm. 1.3 miles through > nothing but trees the entire way. No leaves right now, so yeah, it's pretty > hot. I expect we'll lose 10dB come spring. > > Stats for LUID: 2 Test Duration: 2 Pkt Length: 1714 Test Direction > Bi-Directional > > *Link Test without Bridging* > VC Downlink Uplink Aggregate Packet Transmit Packet Receive > Actual Actual > 18 22.45 Mbps 2.30 Mbps 24.76 Mbps, 1727 pps 3185 (1592 pps) 270(135 pps) > > *Efficiency* > Downlink Uplink > Efficiency Fragments > count Signal to > Noise Ratio Efficiency Fragments > count Signal to > Noise Ratio > Actual Expected Actual Expected > 97% 90296 87723 36 dB B > 38 dB A 94% 9564 9018 29 dB B > 0 dB A > > > * Link Quality Downlink * > RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation > Percentage Average Corrected > Bit Errors > B QPSK 10666 25% 1.868 > B 16-QAM 10662 25% 1.951 > B 64-QAM 10649 25% 2.527 > B 256-QAM 10660 25% 1.839 > A QPSK 10882 25% 0.763 > A 16-QAM 10853 25% 0.952 > A 64-QAM 10839 25% 1.013 > A 256-QAM 10865 25% 0.684 > *Uplink * > RF Path Modulation Fragments Modulation > Percentage Average Corrected > Bit Errors > B QPSK 2432 33% 1.490 > B 16-QAM 2429 33% 1.550 > B 64-QAM 2429 33% 1.485 > Link Test ran on 23:38:38 01/24/2017 UTC > > *Currently transmitting at:* > VC 18 Rate 8X/8X MIMO-B > > On 1/24/2017 2:54 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: > > Wow, I thought only secotors would work on the 450-900 due to the higher > modulation requirements. What kinds of modulation rates are you seeing on > the customer ends with the dual Omni's? > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:43 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> youre not that far of a drive, do you have any of the crack cocaine left? >> >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:30 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> So we're converting a ~20 customer site from four sectors of FSK over to >>> 450i. We put up Antel H-pol and L-com V-pol omni's. Slant at the SM works >>> perfectly fine. I figured it would, just wanted to mention it. >>> >>> This is our first try at this and it seems to be a decent way to convert >>> a smaller site. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > >
