You stretch vlans over your mpls fabric? :(
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:46 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> wrote: > I've never used it on Router OS, so I can't speak to that, but we use it > between each POP and the BNG. > Only real drawbacks that I see are: > You need to be careful about MTUs. > It is harder to use diverse geographically separated upstreams. > > It makes life simple. We run a SVLAN over VPLS to each POP and then assign > each customer a unique CVLAN on that SVLAN. The BNG dynamically creates the > SVAN.CVLAN for the customer, authenticates them via radius, and assigns DHCP > filters, routing instances, etc. We are still working on transitioning > customers and POPs over but thus far it has been pretty painless. > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Jason McKemie > <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >> >> I'll have to catch up on some of those, just wondered what others had >> found. >> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> There are a lot of NANOG presentations on this topic in Google. >>> >>> On Feb 17, 2017 2:27 PM, "Jason McKemie" >>> <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm starting to utilize MPLS/VPLS at the edge of my network for a >>>> specific location, but am wondering if there is any reason to not just use >>>> it all the way back to the core. What are the pros/cons of using MPLS? I >>>> would think that you could save some public IPs if nothing else. >>>> >>>> Also, has anyone had any issues with MPLS/VPLS on the latest stable >>>> RouterOS version (6.38.1)? >>>> >>>> -Jason >> >> > > > > -- > > Carl Peterson > > PORT NETWORKS > > 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 > > Baltimore, MD 21202 > > (410) 637-3707
