Do you keep your DHCP server(s) at the core in this setup? On Friday, February 17, 2017, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> wrote:
> We use it for both and then a few more tags for business clients with > multiple POPs hanging off our network. > > > > Works great. > > > > Just want to push the envelope more with my capacity. > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Jason > McKemie > *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 3:36 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');> > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] MPLS > > > > I was debating on whether to just use VPLS for my management traffic and > then routing customer traffic as normal, or put both in separate VPLS > instances. > > On Friday, February 17, 2017, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sterl...@avative.net');>> wrote: > > I’m using it on 6.38 and so far so good. > > > > I use it all over and at the core. > > > > But I’m still experiencing ‘slow downs’ at the VPLS port where I don’t get > 9Gbps anymore, and it appears to be reduced to 5Gbps and 2Gbps for up/down. > > > > So I’m thinking of reverting back to straight OSPF and VRRP for my main > customer end routing. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 1:27 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] MPLS > > > > I'm starting to utilize MPLS/VPLS at the edge of my network for a specific > location, but am wondering if there is any reason to not just use it all > the way back to the core. What are the pros/cons of using MPLS? I would > think that you could save some public IPs if nothing else. > > > > Also, has anyone had any issues with MPLS/VPLS on the latest stable > RouterOS version (6.38.1)? > > > > -Jason > >
