Do you keep your DHCP server(s) at the core in this setup?

On Friday, February 17, 2017, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net>
wrote:

> We use it for both and then a few more tags for business clients with
> multiple POPs hanging off our network.
>
>
>
> Works great.
>
>
>
> Just want to push the envelope more with my capacity.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Jason
> McKemie
> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 3:36 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] MPLS
>
>
>
> I was debating on whether to just use VPLS for my management traffic and
> then routing customer traffic as normal, or put both in separate VPLS
> instances.
>
> On Friday, February 17, 2017, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sterl...@avative.net');>> wrote:
>
> I’m using it on 6.38 and so far so good.
>
>
>
> I use it all over and at the core.
>
>
>
> But I’m still experiencing ‘slow downs’ at the VPLS port where I don’t get
> 9Gbps anymore, and it appears to be reduced to 5Gbps and 2Gbps for up/down.
>
>
>
> So I’m thinking of reverting back to straight OSPF and VRRP for my main
> customer end routing.
>
>
>
> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason McKemie
> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2017 1:27 PM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] MPLS
>
>
>
> I'm starting to utilize MPLS/VPLS at the edge of my network for a specific
> location, but am wondering if there is any reason to not just use it all
> the way back to the core.  What are the pros/cons of using MPLS?  I would
> think that you could save some public IPs if nothing else.
>
>
>
> Also, has anyone had any issues with MPLS/VPLS on the latest stable
> RouterOS version (6.38.1)?
>
>
>
> -Jason
>
>

Reply via email to