No it wouldn't be stopped by client isolation. You could stop it with VLANs pretty easily.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net> wrote: > Yep!!!! Clients should only be able to reach the Router that is in > question, that it . J > > > > > > *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * > > MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant > <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – > MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE > > > > For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net > > Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com > > Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> > > E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Monday, February 27, 2017 3:42 PM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik quick view for unknown subnets > > > > clients on two different access points wil be blocked by client isolation? > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net> > wrote: > > There is no reason why it would and should not . J You can easily allow > the one offs … > > > > > > *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * > > MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant > <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – > MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE > > > > For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net > > Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com > > Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> > > E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Monday, February 27, 2017 1:13 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik quick view for unknown subnets > > > > A. we have some locations where we dont use client isolation and B client > isolation doesnt apply to two access points as far as I know > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net> > wrote: > > Your client isolation should take care of that. FYI. > > > > > > *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant * > > MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant > <http://www.linktechs.net/productcart/pc/viewcontent.asp?idpage=5> – > MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE > > > > For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net > > Radio Frequiency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com > > Office: 314-735-0270 <(314)%20735-0270> > > E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* Monday, February 27, 2017 12:42 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik quick view for unknown subnets > > > > I wasnt clear, I was actually looking for rogue subnets in general > > another issue example is that a customer with some time clocks recently > had a slick tech put a switch in before the router at multiple locations > from the same site, different APs, we bridge the APs at the POP, so they > were directly communicating > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> > wrote: > > You might find the useful. > > > > https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=23640 > > > > > > Regards. > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 <(305)%20663-5518> > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 <(305)%20663-5518> Option 2 or Email: > supp...@snappytelecom.net > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Monday, February 27, 2017 11:34:59 AM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] Mikrotik quick view for unknown subnets > > If, for example a customer has a router connected backward, is there an > arp(ish) check aside from packet sniffing to see this since its not a > subnet on the interface and there wont be an arp entry? > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
