I had Dennis with LinkTechs plan and deploy my IPv6 using Mikrotik 
routers/routerboards.
I highly recommend Dennis and his team for this, very smooth with the BGP, MPLS 
and OSPF build for handly IPv6.
It just works now, though I’m haven’t fully tested a BGP/partner fail on IPv6 
because ONE of my upstreams (caugh caugh CHUCK) doesn’t route IPv6 yet.

It is working very well though the one provider, native IPv6, dual stacked of 
course because the internet sucks and doesn’t host everything in IPv6 yet.


From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Englhardt
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 5:33 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 Address planning

More to read/learn. Thanks.

Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Paul Stewart
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. März 2017 11:58
An: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 Address planning

This answer varies of course …. one thing with ICMPv6 though is to make sure 
you allow more than just echo/reply … take a look at 
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4890.txt


On Mar 17, 2017, at 4:44 AM, Stefan Englhardt 
<s...@genias.net<mailto:s...@genias.net>> wrote:

Yes we are late but none of our customer needed/wanted ipv6 until now.
So now we are considering our address planning for our infrastructure.
With IPV4 we use private addresses with small subnets between routers.

With IPV6 we are considering using official unicast adresses and a /120 for 
each subnet.
A packetfilter at the Border routers allowing only icmp echo/reply to the /56 
containing
this infrastructure subnets.

What is best practice for a IPV6 addressing in a WISP network?

Reply via email to