I'll give LinkPlanner a shot.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:
> Honestly LinkPlanner is remarkable at calculating this. Add in the trees
> and set the right dBi for the antennas and you'll get a damn good guess.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:58 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It will be worse at 5GHz, and that's all you need to know. These days I
>> would consider -71 dBm marginal, and anything worse is not something that I
>> would want to start with.
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>>
>> On 4/17/2017 1:51 PM, Christopher Gray wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking doing some calculations for a link that is currently 4.7
>>> miles effectively with M365 NanoBridges.
>>>
>>> The signal calculates out to -59 dBm, but in reality it is -71 dBm (12
>>> db loss through foliage).
>>>
>>> Is there a decent way to estimate what the equivalent foliage loss would
>>> be at 5 GHz?
>>>
>>
>>
>
