You need to have them engineered no matter Whitlock oor you buy. They Will do it for free. I bought a 300' last week.
No matter how big the dish is all three mentioned can design a tower to handle it. On Sat, May 6, 2017, 5:37 PM can...@believewireless.net < p...@believewireless.net> wrote: > I was looking at the Sabres and honestly, didn't do too much digging but > was unsure they would > handle the load of such big dishes at the 130ft height. > > On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> I like the shorter Valmonts you can build by yourself and one helper by >> just climbing and attaching one piece at a time. But they are limited to >> 40 feet I think. >> >> *From:* Mitch Koep >> *Sent:* Saturday, May 06, 2017 4:04 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Tower Recommenations >> >> > +1000 >> >> On 05/06/2017 04:51 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote: >> > I have built Valmont, Pirod, and Sabre all several times. I like Sabre >> better than any of them. They go together better and I like the design >> better. Especially compared to Valmont SS flanges. They really stack well. >> >> On Sat, May 6, 2017, 4:31 PM can...@believewireless.net < >> p...@believewireless.net> wrote: >> >> I was leaning towards self support. I'll check out Pirod from Valmont. >>> >>> On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hard to go wrong with a Pirod. Have done many many Valmonts. I would >>>> do freestanding. Less twisting than a guyed tower in my opinion. But more >>>> money. Much larger foundation. But no guys and guy anchors to worry about >>>> over the years. >>>> >>>> *From:* can...@believewireless.net >>>> *Sent:* Saturday, May 06, 2017 2:23 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Tower Recommenations >>>> >>>> We are looking at a location where we would need to erect a tower to >>>> hold at least two 6ft dishes at 130ft. What type of tower(s) would you guys >>>> recommend? >>>> >>> -- >> Mitch Koep >> >> A Better Wireless218-851-8689 <(218)%20851-8689> cell >> >>
