When I did the southern California Linux Expo we about 1600 concurrent users behind a single public v4 ip. Now we did have v6 running too.
Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA) http://ZachUnderwood.me advance-networking.com On May 12, 2017 9:28 AM, "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > If you can avoid NAT (goes without saying) then take that route for sure…. > > But I’d suggest a pool of IP addresses at a minimum for NAT … for 1000 > users, at least a /27 to avoid running into issues with, not just CDN, but > other things as well … > > Also, if possible, consider IPv6 for the event - will take a lot of this > out of play (ie. Google, Netflix, Facebook, Amazon etc etc) > > > On May 11, 2017, at 8:05 PM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: > > > > I'm getting ready to work on a temporary event with lots of People. Is > there a rule-of-thumb for number of NAT Devices behind a public address? > I've heard of issues with getting blacklisted by Google and the likes > thinking that there is an attack happening because of the amount of > requests from a single IP. Can I put 1000 devices behind a single WAN > Address? Just trying to avoid the crisis if someone can't check their > GMail or watch Netflix. > > >
