Is encapsulating eoip a multi-threaded task?
I wonder if there's something on the wiki that tells us what tasks or
processes benefit from more cores.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com>
Sent: 6/6/2017 10:27:03 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Need a better mikrotik tunnel than EOIP
I'm going to CCR1072s Hopefully the issue resolves
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Chris Wright <ch...@velociter.net>
wrote:
I get a hair over 200mbps over encrypted EOIP on a pair of CCR1036’s
with no optimizing (can they be optimized, anyone?).
Chris Wright
Network Administrator
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve Jones
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 3:30 PM
To:af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Need a better mikrotik tunnel than EOIP
For whatever reason, my tunnel has collapsed. throughput went from a
consistent 80 percent of our limiting upstream (100mbps) now over 10
and it goes latency shit
I don't know if its the tunnel as a singularity or if its saturation
of the upstream causing some issues
Fuckall when you have super asymmetric bandwidth and saturate the
little one
EOIP had too much overhead to run encryption on the rb1100ahx2, we are
switching to the CCRs now so it my be better, but I'm finding for
external transit, EOIP doesn't seem to be the right hammer
