excluding fade related issues, what kind of throughput do you get at 50 miles? I wish their linkplanner wasn't all buggy
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 1:29 AM, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: > I’ve got 3 11GHz Mimosa links up, one at 50 miles. Haven’t had a single > issue with any of them. On my 50 mile link under about 80% load capacity, > I get 2-5ms. > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Sean Heskett > *Sent:* Monday, July 24, 2017 8:23 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] SAF CFIP Lumina link aggregation in 2+0 mode vs > Mimosa b11 > > > > Use the SAF integra and you'll get 948Mbps > > > > -Sean > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 8:57 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > We are looking at raising capacity on one of our major link from 366 to > whatever. SAF 2+0 says in the documentation we can go up to 732mbps > > > > Mimosa, with the same antenna characteristics claims different numbers > everytime I look at the report. their path profile tool is junk. > > > > Its a lot of radio sticking with SAF, and supposedly mimosa can do more, > though I suspect its like the ubnt of licensed links, a little more buggy. > We already commited to two mimosa 11ghz links elsewhere on the network, and > weve been told its all software defined do a single unit to spare for all > of them sounds pretty good. > > > > I haven't actually priced cambium, mainly because when we first got into > 11ghz, nobody would quote us > > > > the link is just a little over 10 miles and has a 3' on one side, 4' on > the other, with whatever the SAF interface mount is called > > > > are these mimosa radios worth their salt? theyre dirt cheap, which is > nice, but I'm not feeling a lot of joy so far with them > >
