I see what you did there.. On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
> I thought about reaching out to them but their business is just so... > Boring. > > On Aug 1, 2017 3:20 PM, "Chris Wright" <ch...@velociter.net> wrote: > >> Perhaps it would cost effective to do three short 500M 60-80GHz hops over >> the freeways and railroad tracks with fiber underground through the open >> space between them? At that point it might just be better to go through the >> paperwork headache of boring all the way through. I know a guy in Los >> Angeles who likes digging tunnels. >> >> >> >> Chris Wright >> >> Network Administrator >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke >> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 01, 2017 12:26 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] moving 10gbps 12 miles >> >> >> >> Not in one hop with one set of radios, no. There are ways to achieve 6 >> Gbps full duplex using multiple parallel 18 GHz (80 MHz) dual polarity >> links, if you could coordinate enough high/low frequency pairs on the path. >> It would be a number of dishes and radios. >> >> Or some combination of 11 GHz/80 MHz channel/dual polarity links and >> several 18 GHz/80MHz channel/dual polarity links. I would not recommend >> trying to aggregate such together at L2 due to slightly different >> performance of different radios and polarities on the same path. Aggregated >> together at L3 by having multiple OSPF equal cost links between two >> routers, one on each end, so that the traffic flows between 1GbE router >> interfaces were distributed equally. >> >> There are 10 Gbps 71-86 GHz band radios now. Distances are good for like, >> 2 miles at high reliability, not much more. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Im guessing there is no realistic (cost competitive to fiber) option >> aside from fiber to move this kind of bandwidth, or is there? >> >> >> >> Fiber would require traversing 2 state highways and a railroad track, so >> there is that. >> >> >> >
