I just bought another batch a 100 1x4 PLC Blockless Bare PLC fiber splitters...
Here's the lowdown what that is. It's bare fiber, no 900um jacket and typically no ends. It's 250um. Blockless means that you don't have the big PLC blocks that need to go in a case. You can also get Blockless, and not bare, with ends on it. Regards, Chuck On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:45 AM, <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > Unless you are in high density subdivisions like I am, I would go with > splitters in the splice case. Saves a ton of money. But you have to be > committed to PON. In our method, we can make any sub active with just > opening the cabinet and moving a jumper. > > *From:* Mark Radabaugh > *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 9:10 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters > > Direct splice versus cabinets and patch panels: > > Direct splice is less expensive, reduces vulnerability to vehicle/plow > damage, easy to test the drop cable, and only a single location needs to be > visited to turn up a customer. > > Cons are increased difficulty in troubleshooting and potentially > reflection from unterminated cable (though I have not seen issues and > several other have reported no issues). > > Mark > > > On Aug 11, 2017, at 10:44 AM, ch...@wbmfg.com wrote: > > Now that I think of it, all of our splitters are in cross boxes with them > appearing on patch panels in the neighborhoods. We insert a patch between > the splitter output to the strand going to the house during install time. > Each strand to the homes have their own place on the patch panel too. > > So, all of our splitter outputs are unterminated unless they are in use. > > *From:* Mark - Myakka Technologies > *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 8:41 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters > > Chuck, > > We must have over 100 splitters installed that way. I would say we only > average about 20 users on a 1x32. We haven't seen any issues either. > > > > *-- Best regards,Mark *mailto:m...@mailmt.com > > > *Myakka Technologies, Inc.*www.MyakkaTech.com <http://www.myakkatech.com/> > > > *Proud Sponsor of the Myakka City Relay For Life* > http://www.RelayForLife.org/MyakkaCityFL > <http://www.relayforlife.org/MyakkaCityFL> > > *Please Donate at Please Donate at *http://www.myakkatech.com/RFL.html > > > > > *------Friday, August 11, 2017, 9:48:53 AM, you wrote:* > > So far, I have not encountered a problem caused by unterminated lines. I > think it is due to the fact that it is frequency division duplex and the > transmit reflections not only have to experience splitter loss on the > return trip but there are no receivers looking for energy in that > direction. > > *From:* Mark Radabaugh > *Sent:* Friday, August 11, 2017 7:21 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters > > I have use the ‘bare’ FS PLC splitters before. I can’t recall if the > pigtails had color or were just numbered but they are coated and strip off > exactly the same as the regular 250um acrylic coating. For what it’s > worth they fit nicely into a Tyco A or B size splice tray. we direct > spliced one into a case and terminated all 32 outputs onto the distribution > cable. > > I don’t know that I would do that again simple because it creates a lot of > drops with no control over the reflection at the far end until you connect > those strands to customer houses or another termination panel. So far it > has not created any operation issues but to some extent I think we just got > lucky. > > Mark > > > On Aug 10, 2017, at 11:09 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > When you strip it, it sure looks bare. All the color is gone. > After you strip it, you wipe it off with an alcohol wipe. > And then when you see it in the fusion splicer screen, it looks bare there > too. > Actually it probably has to be totally bare or the coating would > contaminate the burn. > > *From:* Adam Moffett > *Sent:* Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:24 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters > > If the glass was truly "bare" it would be 125um and also be too fragile to > handle. What is referred to as "bare fiber" actually has the 250um acrylic > coating, probably with color added. It's the barest the fiber can be while > still being workable. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Jason McKemie" <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> > To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> > Sent: 8/10/2017 6:24:08 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters > > > That must be it, the "bare fiber" description is a bit misleading in that > case though. Strange way to specify the diameter. > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A "bare fiber" pigtail has 250um acrylic coating. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: ch...@wbmfg.com > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: 8/10/2017 6:07:52 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PLC Splitters > > > That sounds strange to me. > > Is there such a thing as PON on multi mode fiber? > > *From:* Jason McKemie > *Sent:* Thursday, August 10, 2017 3:37 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] PLC Splitters > > I'm looking to possibly do a trial GPON deployment on a leg of my active > network, it looks like the FS.com <http://fs.com/> PLC Splitters are 250µm. > However, singlemode fiber is usually spec'd at a cladding of 125µm. Are > they just using a different measurement or some sort of oddly sized fiber? > > -Jason > > >
