Agreed. Will give it a shot. Firmware too Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone
----- Reply message ----- From: "George Skorup" <george.sko...@cbcast.com> To: <af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4 Date: Sun, Aug 27, 2017 7:11 PM They released 3.5 last week. I'm running it on a couple sites. Seems fine so far. The throughput improvements involve basic bridge config. No extra QoS, no L2/L3 firewall rules. Basically like MikroTik's fast-path. Jay, I think Force200's are going to be your best bet. If your uplink speeds suck, then more gain at the SM and thus higher RSSI at the AP certainly can't hurt. Get the uplink SNRs up and the speeds should come with it. On 8/27/2017 7:03 PM, Steve Jones wrote: The current beta rc says it has throughput improvements, may look into that On Aug 27, 2017 6:00 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: I will post this on the epmp forums a bit later but aside from improving the upload signal or changing the downlink ratio on a timed EPMP system is there any way to improve the upload? We have a few customers I know with signals in the mid 70s on 2.4 that are getting 10-15 meg down but less than a meg up. Sometimes as little as 200k up. Looking to improve that. One (and possibly both) are with an integrated unit with I believe a 60 degree antenna. I feel sure a force 200 with a tighter beamwidth will help increase the received signal at the tower. Any one having this problem? Anyone having any luck using a ubnt radio over a force 200 to get a little better signal strength at the tower? 2.4 and 900 are both challenging bands to work in :)
