Dedicated APs cause more interference. :-) 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 1:09:07 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] AP for VoIP 


I was leaning to having a dedicated AP for the phones. I would think that would 
help but still not ideal. If it goes that way I'll give you a shout. 


On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:31 PM Josh Reynolds < j...@kyneticwifi.com > wrote: 


If you decide to do this, shoot me an email. I'm happy to offer some 
tips as to how to make this work best on UniFi. Like I said, I *do* 
run it at home, but no wireless VOIP solution is without it's hiccups. 
It depends a lot on the demands put on the wireless network, the 
environment, usage patterns, etc. 

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Lewis Bergman < lewis.berg...@gmail.com > 
wrote: 
> Yea, even when you tell people "I don't recommend this, you likely won't be 
> happy. But you are an adult and can make your own decisions." They come back 
> in 3 weeks whining about how bad whatever it was is and how you promised it 
> would work. If they do happen to remember it they are still mad at you since 
> "you told them so" and of course, nobody can be mad at themselves. 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:32 AM Josh Reynolds < j...@kyneticwifi.com > 
> wrote: 
>> 
>> Don't. 
>> 
>> It'll work, then it won't. Then it will, then it won't. 
>> 
>> I guess it depends on how important this is to your reputation vs cost. 
>> 
>> On Aug 28, 2017 10:53 AM, "Lewis Bergman" < lewis.berg...@gmail.com > wrote: 
>>> 
>>> Yea, that is my initial thought as well. I am hoping by 
>>> 
>>> being inside 
>>> being very close to the AP 
>>> being lucky? 
>>> 
>>> I might be able to make this work. 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 10:45 AM Josh Reynolds < j...@kyneticwifi.com > 
>>> wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>> There is no license with anything Ubiquiti other than their licensed 
>>>> radio offerings, and even that isn't through them. 
>>>> 
>>>> I do run several VoIP endpoints in my home. Some wired, some wireless. 
>>>> 
>>>> I would never recommend wireless to feed VoIP unless there was no other 
>>>> option. It doesn't matter if you vlan, have proper dscp, etc - the problem 
>>>> is the nature of the media and it's suceptability to interference and 
>>>> distortion. 
>>>> 
>>>> A sip dect handset to a wired basestation is another animal all 
>>>> together. 
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 28, 2017 10:10 AM, "Lewis Bergman" < lewis.berg...@gmail.com > 
>>>> wrote: 
>>>> 
>>>> I am installing a VoIP system in an old building. It had CAT5 run at 
>>>> some point with pretty crappy cable. Out of 29 cables on a punch down I 
>>>> could only locate 5 jacks that toned, out of those only 1 passed. By the 
>>>> length it is likely that those other 4 just need a few inches cut and 
>>>> re-terminated. 
>>>> 
>>>> Anyway, Only one of those is in the right place. I was considering 
>>>> installing an AP to connect the VoIP phones to and if the AP supported 
>>>> VLAN, 
>>>> DSCP and QOS, maybe let them use it for everything else as well. 
>>>> 
>>>> I looked at the Ubiquiti UAP-AC-LITE-US which says it has WMM for voice 
>>>> and 802.1x. I was also looking at the Xclaim Xi-1 which is a Rukus entry 
>>>> level. I trust the Rukus name more but the UAP is faster and appears to 
>>>> have 
>>>> all the features. Rukus comes with free cloud management and it looks like 
>>>> Ubiquiti is a license. 
>>>> 
>>>> Anyone have experience with VoIP on WiFi with any of the above gear? 
>>>> 
>>>> 
> 



Reply via email to