Mikrotik integrated is starting, I'd wait until that's done and avoid
buying an official "BMU".


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm pushing our infrastructure over to the lighter used NX216 so at least
> the monitoring offloads. but I have to say, it really pisses a guy off when
> hardware specs are removed, really pisses the guy off.
>
> weve been running 750 or so through this one, but bandwidth has increased.
> As best I can tell its not heavy, like 20kpps if I'm understanding the
> attacked MT correctly.
>
> This started with monitoring anomalies, high pings on monitoring devices
> on the BMU, but no customer impact, now its croaking customer latencies.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:15 PM, Adair Winter <ada...@amarillowireless.net
> > wrote:
>
>> I think we started having issues around 600 or 800 subs on our NX216
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 9:14 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <
>> par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> i have heard rumor you might have problems with a nx216 with 500 or so
>>> accounts or higher.
>>> the symptom is when you see "bmu queue" counter start being high(er) on
>>> your billing server.
>>> we have not run into this yet and are still on a nx216 - close to 700
>>> customers i think.
>>>
>>> we have been adding and removing a lot (of customers) lately
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> *From:* Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 25, 2017 8:47 PM
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] powercode bmu specs
>>>
>>> anybody know where the hardware details are? I think we outgrew a bmu,
>>> but with the whole new nonsense website and haphazard tertiary sites I
>>> don't seem to be able to find any specs
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Adair Winter
>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
>> http://www.amarillowireless.net
>> <http://www.amarillowireless.net>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to