I don’t care which solution I use, but I need the following: We can cease to acquire new IPV4 addresses. Able to access IPV4 addresses if there is no V6 DNS for a URL. Customers apps will work flawlessly.
So, I do not want to dual stack if it means I have to keep getting more V4 addresses. If I can use private IP space for dual stack, fine. From: George Skorup Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2017 4:32 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv4 - IPv6 Box What does that "box" do that DNS64+NAT64 doesn't? What's the resistance to regular old dual stack, even if you gotta do IPv4 NAT/CGN due to lack of address space? I'd be hesitant with DNS64/NAT64 w/ IPv6 only clients simply because of dumb customer devices. Dual-stack seems to be the safer, less headache prone approach. Especially the NAT64 thing, since I don't want to buy Juniper and the like, because I'm cheap. If MikroTik would support it, then maybe. On 10/1/2017 4:26 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Chuck has asked about an IPv4 - IPv6 box. I don't know anything about it other than what's on their web site, but I came across this. https://retevia.net/ ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP
