The Tanana products take Orthogon’s original technology to the next level. Each link has 16 radios in them going in the same direction. It’s great for high-interference and nlos with lots of multi-pathing. It isn’t great for pure blockage like trees in which there is no mult-ipathing.
Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jaime Solorza Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 10:14 AM To: Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What is the faster PTP LTE products out there for 3.65GHz or 2.4GHz? Watched some of the Tarana Wireless videos. Reminds me of Orthogan videos and that other company with 5GHz Nlos 800Mbps product that was around 8500.00...i shared pictures and stuff From Tessco show ...two years ago On Oct 3, 2017 11:04 AM, "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote: Not if it was built from scratch to be PTP. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 7:25 AM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What is the faster PTP LTE products out there for 3.65GHz or 2.4GHz? Complexities of the LTE stack, required components for operation, a design around multi-client and not single endpoint performance, etc. On Oct 3, 2017 9:12 AM, "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote: I don’t understand why LTE wouldn’t be “suited”. Assuming no noise, which I have, the PHY Layer should be better. I’m trying to get at least 200Mbps and we are testing both a Prism AC2 and an AirFiber 2x. 900MHz is last resort due to its bandwidth limitations but it’s on the table depending on how this test goes. Budget is also not the problem on this project, just performance. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 7:44 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] What is the faster PTP LTE products out there for 3.65GHz or 2.4GHz? Yeah... LTE isn't particularly well suited to PTP. I guess you could make it work, but it's going to be a little messy. Baicells would probably be the only realistic option, since you wouldn't want to be dealing with an actual LTE core. If you want to try using 3.65ghz, airfiber is probably the best option, but if there's a low noise floor, 2.4ghz is going to work better. 900mhz could also be an option if noise isn't too bad. On Oct 2, 2017 9:37 PM, "Nathan Anderson" <nath...@fsr.com<mailto:nath...@fsr.com>> wrote: I'm confused by the use of "PtP" and "LTE" in the same sentence. -- Nathan From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway Sent: Monday, October 02, 2017 7:27 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: [AFMUG] What is the faster PTP LTE products out there for 3.65GHz or 2.4GHz? I’ve got a remote link, 5 miles, with about ½ mile of trees. I’m going to test 2.4GHz tomorrow but am interested in some of the LTE products that might be out there. Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO 4226 S. 37<https://maps.google.com/?q=4226+S.+37&entry=gmail&source=g>th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040 602-426-0542<tel:(602)%20426-0542> r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net> www.triadwireless.net<http://www.triadwireless.net/> “It’s not the team with the best players that win, it’s the players with the best team that wins!” — Humphrey Bogart
