so, thats the B answer, I have no problem with that What about the A? Im not looking to skirt the system, Im too afraid of "the man" Im always going to go B, Im just very curious. Like a well behaved housewife standing by the oven looking out the window, while the neighbors wife, Linda is throwing the Banquet meal box in the trash can.
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Sean Heskett <af...@zirkel.us> wrote: > You have to modify the license if you change hardware like that but it’s > easy and not expensive (cpl hundred $$ I think but don’t quote me) > > We do it all the time. Upgrade the core and migrate equipment to the edge > etc. > > -Sean > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 9:27 PM Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> So, first off, Im now authorized to approve a $20k purchase. Not big >> money to most of you, but Ive never had that dollar amount authority before >> outside of my personal life.. woot woot >> >> Anyway, we are transferring a fiasco license from a mishap FRN to our FRN >> while migrating to a SAF integra 11gz 1.2gbps link >> >> This got me thinking, we have a lumina link now that we can stick >> somewhere. >> >> Why not license that 57(60) mhz channel at 80 just to have the 80 when we >> relocate it? can we do that? >> >> We also have two mimosa links at 80 that id prefer to have nearer the end >> of our network than closer. As long as we dont exceed EIRP and reuse the >> antenna, is there anything stopping us from just replacing these with the >> more stable integra 2+0? >> >> does the fcc care if the hardware changes, but the pattern stays the same >> without exceeding the EIRP? >> >> kind of looking for two answers >> A. What can we "technically" get away with and not get in trouble >> B. What do we lawfully have to do >> >>
