When my kids were teenagers we had a computer room that had no door and was 
open to the TV room.  High traffic area.  We had 8 kids so lots of people, lots 
of eyes.  

I still referred to the computer room as the masturbatorium much to their 
chagrin.  

From: Nate Burke 
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 11:07 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)

"I just have to check on the kids all the time or be in the same room (four 8 – 
18 yr old boys, lol!)"

Whenever I'm ask how to keep kids from goofing off on the computer, my response 
is always the same.  Put the Computer(s) in the most high traffic room of the 
house, facing into the room.


On 2/6/2018 11:59 AM, Sterling Jacobson wrote:

  I like those comments.

   

  Went they first passed a form of this, I asked their task group to send me 
“the list”.

  They couldn’t do it, and therefore it was not enforceable.

   

  I’m thinking again, unless a state provides “the list”, they can’t force an 
ISP to do anything about it.

   

  Plus it’s entirely fruitless.

   

  They should really go after the content provider networks with better 
abilities to code protect and lock down content.

   

  Like culinary water, I would like to have something potable for my kids.

  But I don’t want the overhead as an ISP, and the definition of “potable” 
water is undefinable really.

   

  They need to leave the “pipe” alone, and focus on the ends, the third party 
filters is where it’s at, and the CDN’s providing better tools.

   

  I can’t properly filter, or code protect even my Netflix on most devices.

  I just have to check on the kids all the time or be in the same room (four 8 
– 18 yr old boys, lol!) and use Qustodio where possible.

  As it is, I’ve had to lock down most stuff to either ON or OFF and I took 
back the smartphone my oldest had because of this.

  Now he has a flip phone with no internet.

   

   

   

   

   

  From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of ch...@wbmfg.com
  Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 10:07 AM
  To: af@afmug.com
  Subject: [AFMUG] OT Porn ..... (filtering)

   

  Based on all your comments (thank you), I sent the following to the 
legislative working group:

  (You guys helped me look smarter than I am ).

   

   

   

  Some random thoughts.

   

  If you are going to an HTTPS site, it is all encrypted.  If you are 
attempting to analyze a flow of traffic HTTPS traffic looks the same to us 
whether it is porn or online banking.  

   

  Do we also block Bit Torrent?

  XBox Grand Theft Auto

  Any game with online chat.  Scrub online chat during games?

  All game servers

  Twitter

  Instagram

  Youtube

  News outlets

  Facebook

  Email

  Instant messaging

  Periscope

  Streaming

  FTP

  IRC

   

  The lowly ping facility has a space for payload.  I could send porn via pings 
if I wanted.  

   

  What is defined as harmful content?  Medical, artistic, Bible readings?  
Genesis 19, 29 etc etc.  

  Language, if so what language?  Bare shoulders. Knees?

  Curtains blowing in the breeze.

   

  How about what I consider pornographic music lyrics.  

  Do we have to police music.  Police Pandora.  

   

  There are always ways around. 

  For every block there is a proxy or VPN that will get you around it.

   

  Filters can give parents a false sense of security.  Filters are gimmicks.  
Snake oil.  

  But we do offer them.  Not home grown.  They are 3rd party.  

   


Reply via email to