Why not both? They rob themselves and also rob Ubiquiti, but that's
better than letting Ubiquiti eat their lunch.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Steve Jones" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: 2/12/2018 11:09:50 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp
I was given the budget if i wanted it for 450. After alot of
consideration i just couldnt justify the 450 cost over epmp. Only a
marginal aggregate gain. Mumimopappajohnspizza is so far not hammered
snot like it was going to be, and hurt more by interference. Afaik 450
was limited in band as well.
Epmp is so cheap you can keep throwing access points at it, different
bands for different distances. We limit epmp to 8 miles, stay
predominately in 5.1, 5 8 has more power, but everybody and their
brother mucks it up.
We do lite APs and buy 4 packs of the upgrade keys so we always have
them on hand.
I used to think cambium shot themselves in the foot with epmp. But
really, they just robbed ubiquiti of a market share
On Feb 12, 2018 9:55 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
Wrong description. They are high value.
Build quality is actually pretty good.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/12/2018 7:20 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
af11's are pretty cheap....
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists
<jeffl...@att.net> wrote:
In general, ePMP.
Jeff Broadwick
CTIconnect
312-205-2519 <tel:%28312%29%20205-2519> Office
574-220-7826 <tel:%28574%29%20220-7826> Cell
jbroadw...@cticonnect.com
On Feb 12, 2018, at 7:08 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
So if y’all were helping a friend would you recommend 450 or ePMP?
I doubt he will ever have more than 50 customers.
I have not had much experience with ePMP in the last 4 years. I
didn’t like it when it first came out.
From:Joe Novak
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 4:56 PM
To:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp
We have a few towers with AF5x and Cambium EPMP co-existing. Some
have vertical separation, some are grain elevators. Just gotta have
some frequency separation. I really like them. Latency under load
is good, it's a purpose built radio and I think it serves it's
purpose well. If he has the option to use the AF5XHD or whatever
the naming convention is even better, I think it hit general
availability.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Jaime Solorza
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
Two AF5x on same tower, One AP on second tower 20 ft away...all
other radios within 4 mile radius...
Jaime Solorza
On Feb 12, 2018 4:43 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
All on the same tower, right?
From:Jaime Solorza
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 4:41 PM
To:Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] mini wisp
Yes..I have two AF5X links as PTP and 25 radios all in 5 GHz off
4 APs in Fabens, Texas sharing spectrum with 3 WISPs...no
issues...
Jaime Solorza
On Feb 12, 2018 4:32 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
Talking to a friend that wants to build a small wisp. He is
about 5.5 miles from a backbone connection. I would suggest
AF5X to him but he is gonna want to use 5 GHz for his wisp I
presume.
Can an AF5X and some 5 GHz cambium (or others) access points
peacefully coexist on a tower?
Very rural area. Not expecting much interference other than
home routers.
