Yeah, but the gain is too low on the LW... it's only good for like 50 feet!

...I know it can actually do better than 50', but still, distance is pretty
limited with the LW to a sector/omni. I'm assuming that most of the PtMP
clients we do will be using the 60-19.

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Harold Bledsoe <hbledso...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> We're working on it.  LW comes in at $299 - we'll keep driving it down!
>
> Another option possibly is to do a mix of 60GHz and pure 5GHz clients.
> Sell 50M plans on 5GHz and 1G plans on 60GHz at a premium.  ;-)
>
> Thanks,
> -Hal
>
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:25 PM SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net> wrote:
>
>> This looks sweet, the AP is at a good price point.   The CPE at 4500 will
>> not work for us, needs to be at $120 to $150.
>>
>>
>>
>> Adam
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Harold Bledsoe
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:27 AM
>>
>>
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] its here, Ignitenet 60ghz trisector
>>
>>
>>
>> Not 50 feet.  ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.ignitenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/
>> MetroLinq-10G-Omni-datasheet.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>> The range depends on the client used so it ranges from 150m to 700m.
>> Keep in mind this isn't a 120 degree fixed sector - it has beamforming so
>> the actual beam is 8 degrees horizontal by 32 degrees vertical - it moves
>> to the client it is talking to at that particular moment in time.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Hal
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:04 PM Robert Andrews <i...@avantwireless.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> 50 feet... :)
>>
>> On 02/20/2018 09:59 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>> > Yikes. What is the range on the 60GHz @ 120 degrees?
>> >
>> > On Tuesday, February 20, 2018, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com
>> > <mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     3 * 120° at 60 GHz
>> >
>> >     1 360°  at 5 GHz
>> >
>> >     1 360° at 2.4 GHz
>> >
>> >
>> >     bp
>> >     <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>> >
>> >     On 2/20/2018 9:13 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>> >
>> >         What's the beamwidth on this?
>> >
>> >
>>
>>

Reply via email to