They definitely have better trains. We definitely have a better highway system. The last century rewarded the US for that with the words best economy. Not sure it will in this one. It almost seems like we built a tool to get addicted to so now we can't kick the habit of everyone having a car.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 4:25 PM Jason McKemie < [email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, you definitely CAN'T be on a schedule with Amtrak. > > On Friday, March 9, 2018, Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yep, taking a train is about being relaxed not about being on a >> schedule... >> >> On 3/9/18 1:50 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote: >> > Damn. Go to bar car and get drunk.. ain't no big thing...make it a party >>> >>> Jaime Solorza >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018, 2:27 PM Adam Moffett <[email protected] <mailto: >>> [email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> lol train neutrality >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> From: "Cameron Crum" <[email protected] <mailto: >>> [email protected]>> >>> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> Sent: 3/9/2018 4:19:07 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Amtrak >>> >>> I would say that Since the railroads make most of their money off >>>> of freight and only a small portion from Amtrak, freight probably >>>> gets priority. Too bad there is no "train neutrality". >>>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:10 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> So what the heck does it mean that my train is delayed by >>>> "freight train interference"? >>>> >>>> Do the railroads have a QoS policy favoring bulk downloads >>>> over realtime traffic? Seems backwards. The freight wouldn't >>>> care if it took an extra hour. Just sayin. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>
