Never been an LMR fanboy Jaime Solorza
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 8:51 PM Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm with Steve. I spent way too much time removing LMR from towers to > turn back now! > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net> wrote: > >> LTE has some characteristics that are desirable from a operation in NLOS >> and difficult conditions and there is certainly a desire in the market to >> have a non-proprietary solution available for the customers who require >> that. Some WISP’s are much more of a investment vehicle and looking to >> outside financing or acquisition than others. Investors don’t like single >> supplier solutions and it’s difficult to explain the value to them. >> >> On the other hand if you want a best in class product for LOS >> environments and are less concerned about the investment value and more >> concerned about performance and quality service the proprietary solutions >> can be a better answer. >> >> Cambium’s just trying to make sure they have a product for both types of >> customers. >> >> Mark >> >> > On Mar 25, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> wrote: >> > >> > I cant understand why Cambium opens up another additional platform. Why >> not develop 450 line further implementing some physical layer goodies of >> LTE. I've seen this step with Wimax/PMP320 and all know where this ended up. >> > >> > Once they implemented LTE stuff it is outdated as 5G is moving in. >> > >> > >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> >> Von: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> Im Auftrag von Matt Hoppes >> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. März 2018 20:37 >> >> An: af@afmug.com >> >> Betreff: [AFMUG] Cambium LTE >> >> >> >> What’s known about the Cambium LTE product so far? >> > >> > >> >> >
