Have done, both below 20 dBm
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jon Langeler Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 6:21 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz Licensed Link best power and Rx Sensitivity Check Aviat and SIAE also Jon Langeler Michwave Technologies, Inc. On Apr 19, 2018, at 8:55 PM, SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net <mailto:li...@sbb.net> > wrote: Yes, in so much as I don’t want to pay the extra $100 plus per month for each foot of dish….. If there is a 2 foot solution I want to find it. As I said Dragonwave will work but I don’t want to wait. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 3:03 PM To: Motorola III <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz Licensed Link best power and Rx Sensitivity Are you restricted in antenna size at both ends? If one could be larger, that would get you the range. -- bp part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com <mailto:part15...@gmail.com> > wrote: I think he needs a bigger channel size than you can do in 6GHz. -- bp part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Jeff Broadwick - Lists <jeffl...@att.net <mailto:jeffl...@att.net> > wrote: Yeah, I’m not aware of that change in 6GHz. Have you checked with Comsearch to see about 11GHz. Liz is my go-to, but Comsearch has access to information no one else seems to have. Jeff Broadwick CTIconnect 312-205-2519 Office 574-220-7826 Cell jbroadw...@cticonnect.com <mailto:jbroadw...@cticonnect.com> On Apr 19, 2018, at 5:27 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net <mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net> > wrote: >>>Fcc changed the rules. You can do 2’ in 6ghz now. Can you please share the ref where and when this was changed ? Thanks. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom http://www.snappytelecom.net Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net <mailto:supp...@snappytelecom.net> _____ From: "Sean Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us <mailto:af...@zirkel.us> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 4:59:57 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz Licensed Link best power and Rx Sensitivity Fcc changed the rules. You can do 2’ in 6ghz now. Why are you limited to 2’ dishes?? Can you do a 2’ and 3’ (or 4’)?? What you are trying to do breaks the laws of physics no matter who’s equipment you use. Sean On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:42 PM SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net <mailto:li...@sbb.net> > wrote: Love to but 11 GHz is all gone. I don’t think you can do 2 foot dishes at 6 GHz? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of Sean Heskett Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 3:51 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz Licensed Link best power and Rx Sensitivity what rain zone are you in? yes our link is in 18GHz honestly if you need 1gbps with 4.5 nines with 2' dishes at 6 miles you probably need to look at 11GHz or 6GHz instead of 18GHz. -sean On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:08 PM, SmarterBroadband <li...@sbb.net <mailto:li...@sbb.net> > wrote: Cambium 820's will be down to around 400 meg at 4.5 nines. We want the link to hold 1 Gig at 4.5 nines. -----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 2:53 PM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz Licensed Link best power and Rx Sensitivity What does link planner say you need? Five nines I presume? bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 4/18/2018 1:12 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: > Yes, looking at both. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On > Behalf Of Seth Mattinen > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 12:44 PM > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz Licensed Link best power and Rx Sensitivity > > On 4/18/18 12:31 PM, SmarterBroadband wrote: >> SAF seems to have the lowest output power I have seen…. Especially >> the G and GS. > > I would look at the RX sensitivity tables. >
