Has anything changed in this aspect? Are images a contribution to
wikipedia just because something is uploaded unto commons?
Isaac, you wrote: "It would be counterproductive to not accept images
that are not properly described or categorized." - Please allow me to
see this the other way round. My understanding of common is as a
supportive tool for article authors. I do not find it productive to
fill space with lots of badly (even not at all) categorized or poorly
(even uselessly) described images.
Cheers
Ingo
Also, please check that one out
*https://tinyurl.com/yhe6ehhx*
*
*
*Very experimental...*
*
*
*Florence
*
_______________________________________________
African-Wikimedians mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians
