Logger names are definitely better that way. LoggerManager is fine, too. I still don't like the concept of LoggerGroups that much since I think it's overhead, who in the world needs LoggerGroups if everything is Observer style. But LoggerGroup (without the "s") is okay if we want to have it.
- David > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Mike Vincent > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 2:46 PM > To: Bob Zoller; Agavi Development > Subject: Re: [agavi-dev] Logging opinions needed > > How opposed would you (guys?) be to changing the names from Loggers to > LoggerGroups and Appenders to Loggers ? > > * LoggerManager > ** LoggerGroups > *** FileLogger > *** MailLogger > *** StderrLogger > *** StdoutLogger > > Does the current naming only bug me? *shrug* :) > > -Mike > (this is the time to change it if we do) > _______________________________________________ > agavi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev _______________________________________________ agavi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://labworkz.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/agavi-dev
