mean't "wasn't being dismissive". Typing too fast On 6/11/19, Mike Archbold <jazzbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Jim, It just reminded me of the Gardenfors work -- I was being at all > dismissive of your posts. I was just pointing the work out in case you > were not familiar with it. On the whole, I'm not dismissive of > anybody's ideas in AGI. It's all a wide open space IMO. > > On 6/11/19, Jim Bromer <jimbro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I remember that someone kept dismissing my notion of conceptual >> relativism >> and finally he mentioned some book that had been written 40 or 50 years >> ago >> which had mentioned that concepts were relative. I wondered - could it be >> true? Could someone have examined conceptual relativism decades ago? I >> did >> not find the book that he mentioned but I did find references to it and I >> found work that was done by the authors around the time the book was >> published. The authors mentioned a lot about the fact that concepts are >> relative and nothing about the notion that concepts are relativistic. It >> would be tedious of me to go over the difference again, but there is a >> major difference. The idea that I am talking about something that had >> been >> settled and the closed 20 or 50 years ago is dismissive. But it is also >> amusing because it means you are all chasing the latest fads (which are >> admittedly making great advances) while leaving the field of my special >> interests free, open, and unsullied for me. So thank you for not getting >> it. (I am not being cranky, I really believe that we are representative >> of >> the areas of interest that other people are pursuing, some much more >> effectively than we are, and this mini sampling indicates that there is >> something here that might be worthwhile for me to examine partly because >> there is not going to be much competition.) >> Jim Bromer >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:54 PM Mike Archbold <jazzbo...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> This topic reminds me of this book from almost 20 years ago: >>> >>> https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/conceptual-spaces >>> >>> >>> >>> On 6/11/19, keghnf...@gmail.com <keghnf...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Generative Neural Networks, GAN. >>> > This give give a relation from stating image or data to another. >>> > >>> > Latent Space Human Face Synthesis | Two Minute Papers #191: >>> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aR6M0MQBo2w >>> > >>> > A programmer select two images or data points. >>> > A programmer put in 50 percent value into a GAM and train it to be >>> > 50 >>> > percent transformation >>> > between to faces. This 50 percent value is called a "latent value" >>> > >>> > Latent value can used for mapping distance in weight space. >>> > >>> https://towardsdatascience.com/graduating-in-gans-going-from-understanding-generative-adversarial-networks-to-running-your-own-39804c283399 >>> > >>> > The latent value can be used to make movement vectors through weight >>> > space: >>> > https://poloclub.github.io/ganlab/ >>> > >>> > Unsupervised GAN's are the way of the brain, artificial or real: >>> > >>> https://www.academia.edu/37275998/A_Nice_Artificial_General_Intelligence_How_To_Make_A_Nice_Artificial_General_Intelligence
------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T395236743964cb4b-M62cc45193bada57bf0b11203 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
