Call it physics envy if you want, but you just labelled the best currently 
working applied ai with an insult!
It *could* be computable, ppl dont know if p=np or not!
you seem to understand how occams razor can avoid just restoring the input 
frames, via picking simplest model, i dont know if it works, but as a very 
stupendously simple metric it seems to work as a theory. yes, i believe in 
that.  but-> the anti-prediction machine -> yeh but if it does that, is it a 
successful behaviour or is it rubbish movements that stop it getting to its 
goal?
It has to achieve its goal at the same time, if you were going to write that.
------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T28a97a3966a63cca-M86470f1c1111436ecfc83e99
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to