Indeed, why not all constructed languages? However, the context-manager, as effective human-to-machine and machine-to-human translation manager - scientifically verifiable for validity and reliability - would still be required. Else, any mono translation would still only be an opinionated translation, a monolanguage, or monologue even, of another sophistication? Broader perhaps, but mono none the less. In my view, a context universe manager would be a critical success factor.
________________________________ From: Daniel Jue <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, 22 February 2021 20:30 To: AGI <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [agi] AGI Tail Wags AGI Dog Why not Esperanto or Lojban or Ido? On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:13 PM A.T. Murray <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: An arch-fiend Singularitor has joined Grex Latine Loquentium ("Flock of Latin Speakers") with a deep subterfuge of setting the world of classical scholars on fire with the ineluctable meme of AI Minds thinking in ancient Latin and breathing life into the moribund if not croakingly dead Latin language. http://ai.neocities.org/RoadMap.html#motd https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06492.html -- Daniel Jue Cognami LLC 240-515-7802 www.cognami.ai<http://www.cognami.ai> Artificial General Intelligence List<https://agi.topicbox.com/latest> / AGI / see discussions<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi> + participants<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/members> + delivery options<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription> Permalink<https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T0deb4293afe00d98-Mcbf8ccd8d6bed2b5a90b9685> ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T0deb4293afe00d98-Mb497493f86e3248314e5362f Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
