On Tuesday, May 04, 2021, at 12:15 PM, immortal.discoveries wrote: > He wants you to read his *formal *papers WOM.
I already did -- the last one he posted here, that is. I still have questions. On Tuesday, May 04, 2021, at 12:14 PM, John Rose wrote: > That's similar to saying consciousness is irrelevant to > electronic/electromagnetic communications. Luckily Bell, Apple, and the > thousands of related companies, the development of the internet, etc. were > all about consciousness and not just bits and electrons. I'd say that none of those things have anything to do with phenomenal consciousness. If you look above the "bit and electron" level, they have to do with information and symbols. Information and subjective first-person experience are two completely different things, and I can see no guarantee that one causes the other, either. On Tuesday, May 04, 2021, at 12:26 PM, Mike Archbold wrote: > Hopefully Colin will be along soon to answer... but in general, for the last 10 years I've been reading him emphasizing "science, science, science, science"! Yes, well ... saying "science, science, science, science!" doesn't actually make one scientific. ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T7c7052974ce450f1-M1b6bf5ad198d1481d4f90c1f Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
