On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 10:40 AM John Rose <[email protected]> wrote:

> ... I’ve spent time thinking about how to create a truth machine.
> Essentially a system that seeks truth and unbiasedly reports it unlike the
> fake fact checkers. Perhaps someone here has heard of such a thing…
>

That was my motive for suggesting a text compression prize back in 2005
<https://web.archive.org/web/20080321145324/http://www.geocities.com/jim_bowery/cprize.html>
.

I'd had the idea of a "truth speaker" for several years before that, but it
hadn't crystalized in my mind as a lossless compression competition until I
came up with the idea of what I called "The C-Prize" and Matt Mahoney
referred me to Marcus Hutter's work.

I'd had a history of proposing various *objective criterion *prizes that
got some attention if not funding:

https://web.archive.org/web/20041231194109/http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,39865,00.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20050115130425/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6383323/#041105a

https://web.archive.org/web/20060221191638/http://www.geocities.com/jim_bowery/BussardsLetter.html

I emphasize "objective criterion" because, as I've often stated over the
DECADES now:

The more judging discretion, the more likely the positions of "judge" will
be occupied by the wrong kind of people which will, in turn, drive away
serious competitors.

This is something that isn't exactly "lost" on the various foundations that
offer up "prizes" or "challenges", so much as runs counter to their hidden
purpose:

Social status for the endowing individuals and their friends.

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tabec1b959b565c28-Mfa6e456846b1177ca1b13526
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to