Another example of the AGI's malign impact:

Network effect censorship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifhC-maXJ3o

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 9:20 AM James Bowery <[email protected]> wrote:

> The single biggest problem with the economy is capital misallocation
> resulting from private capture of positive network externalities inherent
> in civilization.  I foresaw this back when I was responsible, in large
> measure, for the change in law resulting now in the spate of orbital launch
> services, and wrote this paper proposing to replace taxes on economic
> activity with a single tax on liquidation value of net assets, and to take
> the revenue and replace virtually all government services with a citizen's
> dividend.
>
> http://ota.polyonymo.us/others-papers/NetAssetTax_Bowery.txt
>
> I also, in that paper, predicted the demographic implosion that people are
> still coming to grips with:
>
> The global economy, as it stands, is a malign cyborg -- an "unfriendly
> AGI" that consumes the genetic basis of its own components by outbidding
> the family for the fertile years of the most economically valuable
> females.  The pig-in-a-poke "transhumanists" are standing in the way of
> correcting this AGI's malign impact on the world with their hopium.
>
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 5:02 PM Matt Mahoney <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2021 at 5:57 AM Quan Tesla <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > "Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a
>> six hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back
>> full employment."
>> >
>> > Would this mean that government employees would have to productively
>> work 2 hours extra per day?
>> 
>> This would only work in a fantasy model of economics where jobs are
>> interchangeable and at no cost. In reality, we have both unemployment
>> and a labor shortage. It costs 1% of lifetime earnings to the employer
>> and employee to change jobs within similar fields, and much longer to
>> learn a new field.
>> 
>> So in this fantasy world, we would already be at full employment.
>> Reducing hours by 25% would reduce GDP by 25%, resulting in a 3 year
>> decrease in life expectancy. (Each doubling of income adds 5 years).
>> 
>> And we don't WANT full employment. 60% of Americans don't work now,
>> and we are fine with that. Some are too young or too old or busy
>> raising children or disabled or have low IQ or criminal records or are
>> addicted to drugs. Unemployment statistics only count those with job
>> skills who are being paid by the government to not work.
>> 
>> What we want are intelligent machines that will make work easier,
>> safer and more productive, raising our incomes while lowering the
>> costs of goods and services.
>> 
>> --
>> -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]

------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T50e86f61cc07a7b3-M491b47dba8ccafa9fb1274a6
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to