That's cool, this is connectivity clustering I was talking about:

"Equipped with this scene graph, we can then retraverse the frames and assign 
the same label to each surface in the segmentation map that belongs to the same 
connected component in the scene graph.This allows distinct surface components 
to be identified as part of the same object across splits and joins over time 
(Fig. 6A,Row 5)."

It forms graphs, objects, surfaces, so it's still learning, but lateral. They 
should say that's not training, which is vertical.  Their segmentation criteria 
is match of contiguous brightness and lateral shift vectors, and I could add 
other types of match to that. Segmentation is just a top-down perspective on 
connectivity clustering. 

I don't think any of that is terribly novel, just classical computer vision 
that people forgot after shift to neural nets. Because NNs are far easier to 
scale in complexity, from coding and parallelization perspective. That's the 
biggest problem with consistent connectivity clustering, it's whole lot harder 
to design and to utilize brute force than centroid-based clustering.   


------------------------------------------
Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI
Permalink: 
https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T943406c9c46e5cad-M1dc8952bae6182634f3cbe41
Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription

Reply via email to