Here they basically reveal their definition of "understanding" "A question that might be lingering on many readers’ mind is whether GPT-4 truly understands all these concepts, or whether it just became much better than previous models at improvising on the fly, without any real or deep understanding. We hope that after reading this paper the question should almost flip, and that one might be left wondering how much more there is to true understanding than on-the-fly improvisation. Can one reasonably say that a system that passes exams for software engineering candidates (Figure 1.5) is not really intelligent? Perhaps the only real test of understanding is whether one can produce new knowledge, such as proving new mathematical theorems, a feat that currently remains out of reach for LLMs."
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:57 PM <immortal.discover...@gmail.com> wrote: > > "Given the breadth and depth of GPT-4's capabilities, we believe that it > could reasonably be viewed as an early (yet still incomplete) version of an > artificial general intelligence (AGI) system." > > https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.12712 > Artificial General Intelligence List / AGI / see discussions + participants + > delivery options Permalink ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/T208c0ae6f6f8ee11-M4ee4621e616e553c970e2f78 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
