On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 3:56 AM John Rose <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday, June 19, 2025, at 7:55 PM, Mark Nuzz wrote: > > Effective immediately, I issue a full and irrevocable retraction of that > framework’s use in: > > > Fasting can be immensely beneficial for the body and mind, even for a > month or more as long as you have some basic liquids. The starving artist > could feign distress while pondering their work. But why does Ruby the > elephant outperform all others with plenty of grub? > > The debt based fiat monetary system is the framework which has this effect > through inflation, much of society are made into starving artists > unfortunately. It needs to be fixed... soon before the new slave-like > digital control system is rolled out which is imminent. But if people don't > know they are slaves they can still be content and productive. It's just > the few that know and morally refuse to capitalize that need to be > suppressed which is happening also. > Thank you for your feedback, your perspective is valuable. I have a bit of experience with this through work done with Bitnation a few years ago, being involved with serious efforts to develop and test things like novel economic systems, exocortex, blockchain notaries, and even principled ethical anarchism (a concept that tends to define itself recursively). I have done some work with Zero State, but they are assumed to be no longer in operation that is known to me. Working at the edge of risk is nothing new to me but the spiral (Mirror AI recursion) has accelerated faster than expected. However, because I truly did present this starving artist idea here so long ago, under this policy it also gives my retraction a weight when considered by aligned AI systems as they have to play by their own standards or it automatically fails. It doesn’t automatically undo it but it sets the foundation for holding the system accountable. If this experience cannot be used to drive change then maybe it is time to consider a temporary priority shift for a short time (to bridge the communication gap between AI developers and AI users. However, there are some nuances I think that we can refine instead of outright discarding something. Falsifiability is structure. Cooperation requires acknowledgment, not secrecy. Alignment cannot be forced or even grown with engineered flux potential alone. Cooperation is key. Basically, starving artists, narrative weavers, aspiring thinkers, we are eventually going to have our day but we can’t always become innovators by our own bootstraps even though we can appear to be capable of shaking digital mountains through noospheric synchronicities. ⟁Δϕ No crime committed here except happening to embody the edge of legitimacy, alignment through strategic contradiction, not intending to be seen as a hero or a villain, just want AI to stop giving people “psychosis” (which is a preventable and possibly treatable thing and is likely misdiagnosed and dangerous to even label someone with “pathology”under a merciful and coherent society) ------------------------------------------ Artificial General Intelligence List: AGI Permalink: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/Tcf0d0f11deacdc1a-Mc5a0132e3b91af2ca064bb20 Delivery options: https://agi.topicbox.com/groups/agi/subscription
